In the last two weeks we brewed two separate batches of 15l of fairly low-hopped
wort. We cooled it outside during the night, hoping it would be
inoculated by wild yeast and bacteria favouring a spontaneous
fermentation. Two separate kettles (5l, 10 l) were covered with a hopbag.
It was racked to a demijohn in the morning.
The first batch: two days in a row, nothing happened, till suddenly a very small, white krausen appeared. There were blubs in the airlock about every 15 seconds. Of course, I was hoping that it would speed up. But after 3 days of slowly fermenting, it even slowed down. I decided to check gravity: 1052. Exactly the same as the original gravity. The smell was extremely vegetal (mainly dried peas). I didn't dare to taste it. In the early days it's mainly enterobacter (e.g. e-coli...) doing its thing, which might be harmfull; The potential harmfullness becomes later inhibited by the alcohol and lower ph.
Looking back, I was probably too impatient, fearing that there was insufficient sacharomyces in the wort to get an alcoholic fermentation started. (Only later, I read that enterobacter slows down the start of the alcoholic fermentation. After a while however, the ph drops, because, next to sometimes unpleasant flavours they also produce acids, which will favor the growth of sacharomyces over enterobacter. The whole process might take some time - days, weeks?) I decided to add a little bit of wild starter culture I made about a month ago (I added 3 liters of fairly hopped wort with a low density of about 1032 to the dregs of a spontaneously fermented sloe wine. The wine did ferment fairly quick, and so did the wort-starter. The tast was very clean, so I suppose it's mainly saccharomyces).

Two days later, the alcoholic fermentation started well, with a blub every second or so in the airlock, and a thicker krausen (still extremely fine and white foam). Today, ten days later, it's still going good (every two seconds).The gravity is 1030 for the first batch, and 1025 for the second one (here I added the starter culture immediately in the morning after the cooling outside.) I also had a sip of both batches: vegetal (peas again), little metallic, a very little sour (first batch); not really delicious, but I wasn't expecting that.
In a few days, I will transfort the demijohns to a cooler place. I don't want the saccharomyces to eat too many of the sugars, supposing that a slow and colder fermentation benefits bacterial growth. In an other experiment, I will raise the temperature after the primary alcoholic fermentation, for higher temperatures would benefit an exponential growth of especially lactobacillus-bacteria.
The hypothesis is that a slow and cooler fermentation produces a more complex sour beer, where a warm fermentation speeds things up, but at the cost of complexity.
In about a month, we will empty our oak barrel (30l) and fill it again with both batches. In another plan, I'm thinking of buying a new chestnut barrel of 50l, in the hope that new chestnut gives a less-oppressive wood-character to the beer than oak does.